Saturday 25 October 2014


The Great Gatsby (2013) Review

 

Sadly I’m rather late watching this film, I mean, it was released in May 2013! But I am so glad that I’ve now seen it! I’ve been an admirer of Baz Luhrman’s films since I watched Moulin Rouge in the cinema when I was thirteen and fell completely in love with his directorial style.

 
The Most Romantic Scene in a Film Ever

The Great Gatsby has the usual Luhrman style involving sped up pacing and heightened drama to the point of being magical, or even surreal, that makes me giddy. The note of twisted reality, which he is famous for, is created in this adaptation with the tweaked, newly jazzified R’n’B songs, such as 100$ Bill and Crazy In Love which accompany the film as well as in the opulence of the set, lighting and costume.

BeyoncĂ©’s Crazy In Love

I’ve seen the original Robert Redford film from 1974, and loved it. This is the main reason that I avoided watching the film for so long. Luhrman outshines Jack Clayton in transforming F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel to the screen. Because Luhrman’s style is so sensational it perfectly portrays the glittering world of the giddy, heady heyday of the Jazz era that Gatsby was desperate to fit into and that Nick Carraway got swept into unwittingly. The underworld and secrecy of the Prohibition is also clearly presented as the viewer is invited, as is Nick, into the hidden clubs thriving on sales of illegal alcohol.

In terms of the acting, Tobey Maguire as the depressed, and grieving Nick Carrway telling the story of Jay Gatsby’s life and death in order to get over his friend’s death is made the frame for the film, with the viewer being reminded that this is Nick Carraway’s story as much as it is Jay Gatsby’s. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s words frequently appear on the screen over the action, reminding the audience of the original novel.  Rather than breaking the fourth wall as I thought this technique might, it actually focuses the viewer’s attention back onto Nick Carraway, who is more central in Luhrman’s film than in Clayton’s.

Leonardo DiCaprio as Jay Gatsby is romantic and charming, however this is a very similar role to that of Jack Dawson in Titanic (1997) and one which Leonardo plays well and often.


Like Two Peas In A Pod

Jack Clayton’s credits role on images of Gatsby’s empty house but with the sound of a swinging party being played in the background hinting at the hollowness of the jiving life of the elite. The film propre then starts with Nick Carraway attempting to sail a dinghy solo with a VO of the opening lines of the novel, whereas Luhrman uses the same technique of a VO, however the scene pictured is the green light which Jay Gatsby would reach out for from across the water when he was alive, made hazy from mist and with snow falling thickly. Luhrman’s film also gets straight into the action, unlike Clayton who has opening credits, making Luhrman’s film much more dynamic.

Carey Mulligan as Daisy Buchanan against Mia Farrow’s Daisy Buchanan is much more attractive due to her portrayal of the warmth of personality and her fear of making the great leap into the unknown away from the comfort of her husband’s wealth. Mia Farrow’s Daisy I find sickeningly sweet and silly, there is not enough warmth in her presentation of the role to explain why Jay Gatsby was prepared to do so much. This might be a result of something as simple as the use of light in Luhrman’s film which is warm, to capture the wealth and glamour of the time as well as the heat of the summer in which the film takes place.

Mia Farrow vs Carey Mulligan

Other supporting roles include Isla Fisher as Myrtle and Jason Clarke as George Wilson contribute to the swirling madness and decadence of the Roaring Twenties with their unhappy, rage-filled marriage. Finally, it is a pity that Luhrman did not include the final scene where Nick Carraway meets Jay’s working-class father at Jay’s funeral. It would have been really interesting to see where Luhrman went with this tender and revealing moment given his ostentatious style.

Thursday 2 October 2014

Review of RSC's Love's Labour's Lost in Stratford-Upon-Avon


The RSC's production of Shakespeare's Love's Labour's Lost whilst providing the usual glamour and glitz of a typical night at the award winning theatre with beautiful Edwardian costumes and a moving set, the Prince's vision to study for three years without any pesky women getting in the way with their distracting boobs, bums and other feminine bits was sadly distorted by an apparent last minute attempt to wedge in a reminder of the centenary of World War One. The final scene where the Prince and his fellow scholars reappear on stage in officers' uniforms ready to depart for The Front did not match the lines that they had delivered just a minute beforehand so the resulting effect was that it looked like The RSC did not want to get into any hot water for forgetting to commemorate the centenary! If they had wanted to stage a Shakespeare play and set it in the summer of 1914 then there are plenty of plays which would lend themselves well to this resituating, such as Julius Caesar, Coriolanus, Othello, Anthony and Cleopatra or even Henry IV part 1 and 2, which they staged this year!


On the whole, however, the production is very good. Don Armado provided a fantastic 'Spanglish' accent and presented a sweet and poignant relationship with his man servant, Mote. The rooftop scene where Berowne overhears the Prince and his friends alternately outpouring their love in their crafted sonnets was extremely amusing, especially with the introduction of Teddy. As such, definitely a show to watch with the poorly thought out and last minute insertion of WW1 being a minor blot on a very good and very funny production!